[foaf-protocols] revisiting FOAF project goals
kidehen at openlinksw.com
Sat Jun 20 18:58:06 CEST 2009
Dan Brickley wrote:
> I haven't explicitly written about goals for this project since 2000,
> when we called it RDFWeb (and before that RDFWebRing).
> That original document is here,
> http://www.foaf-project.org/original-intro (with one major change, I put
> the new name everywhere that it used to say RDFWeb).
> Here's what the project website said about goals in mid 2000:
> We want a better way of keeping track of the scattered fragments of data
> currently represented in the Web.
> We want to be able to find documents in the Web based on their
> properties and inter-relationships; we want to be able to find
> information about people based on their publications, employment
> details, group membership and declared interests. We want to be able to
> share annotations, ratings, bookmarks and arbitrary useful data
> fragments using some common infrastructure. We want a Web search system
> that's more like a database and less like a lucky dip. We need it to be
> be distributed, decentralised, and content-neutral.
> FOAF, if successful, should help the Web do the sorts of things that are
> currently the proprietary offering of centralised services.
> RDF seems to offer a lot of promise in this area. While RDF is defined
> in terms of a rather abstract information model, our needs are rather
> practical. We want to be able to ask the Web sensible questions and
> common kinds of thing (documents, organisations, people) and get back
> sensible results.
> * "Find me today's web page recommendations made by people who work
> for Medical organisations".
> * "Find me recent publications by people I've co-authored documents
> * "Show me critiques of this web page, and the home pages of the
> author of that critique"
> * etc...
> All this sounds a bit ambitious (and it is), but we think we've a
> reasonable sense of how to build a linked information system with these
> capabilities. """
> As I look at getting a revised statement of goals written, I'd love to
> hear more about what folk on the FOAF mailing lists find interesting,
> compelling or intriguing. What motivates you to spend time working with
> FOAF and RDF and linked data? Why do you care? How did you end up on
> this mailing list, or interested in RDF and Semantic Web?
> Am interested in any and all responses to this, on-list, or offlist,
> blogged or emailed.
> Thanks for your thoughts!
> foaf-protocols mailing list
> foaf-protocols at lists.foaf-project.org
1. Infrastructure for Federated Identity (exposed via document that
contain FOAF based personal profile metadata) as we see via FOAF+SSL
2. Untethered & Dynamic Social Networking.
Kingsley Idehen Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
President & CEO
OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
More information about the foaf-protocols